Questionnaire mode · advisory before install
Readiness Doctor

See if SendyKit is the right path before you buy.

Answer a serious operator-grade assessment, get a path recommendation, and leave with exact next steps. No core edits. No kill switch. No vague quiz fluff.

Wraps around Sendy without modifying core Fail-open self-hosted licensing Questionnaire now, real CLI scan when ready
Run the Assessment Read the Docs

No risky rewrite

Self-hosted SendyKit wraps around the licensed Sendy install you already run. The goal is a safer operator layer, not a destructive platform replacement.

Explainable recommendations

The output is never just a score. You get a lane recommendation, the top reasons why, the likely blockers, and the next actions.

Humans and agents both benefit

The website gives advisory routing. The CLI and API give a canonical readiness object once you have real environment access.

Assessment

Calm, specific, route-aware.

This public mode is advisory. It does not inspect your server. It does give you a commercially honest recommendation and an inboarding path you can actually follow.

Public questionnaire mode — use sendykit readiness --json later for an environment-backed result.
1. What kind of operator are you?
2. What is your current Sendy reality?
3. How comfortable are you running services on your own server?
4. What do you need soon?
Ready with guidance 78/100

Self-Hosted Standard — Current + 3

Best fit for operators who already run Sendy, want ownership, and have enough ops comfort to keep the engine room under their own control.

Why this path

    Likely blockers or cautions

      Next actions

        Want a real environment-backed answer?
        sendykit readiness --json
        What this page is really checking

        Not a toy quiz. A buying and setup filter.

        Operating model fit

        Ownership vs managed operations is the first fork. This page helps route that decision before pricing tables blur together.

        Commercial honesty

        Self-hosted uses Standard/Pro with Current + 1 / +3 / +5 / Sovereign. SaaS uses Starter/Growth/Scale/Enterprise with connected-site and API economics.

        Next-step continuity

        Every result should end with a real next move: buy the right lane, read the right docs, or run the CLI scan on the server you actually operate.

        CLI

        Already on the server? Run the authoritative path.

        The website is questionnaire mode. The CLI can inspect the real environment and return the canonical readiness object that powers agents, support, and future admin surfaces.

        $ sendykit readiness --recommend
        SendyKit readiness: READY_WITH_WARNINGS (84/100)
        Recommended path: Self-Hosted Pro — Current + 3
        Why: ownership preference strong · 2–3 site expectation fits Pro · AI + automations required
        Next: docs → install → migrate → doctor

        $ sendykit readiness --json
        # canonical machine-readable report for agents and support workflows
        FAQ

        What this assessment does and does not do

        This public page is questionnaire mode, so it is advisory. It helps you choose the right lane and next step. For environment-backed diagnostics, run the CLI on the real server.

        No. The self-hosted model is explicitly wrap-around, not rewrite-first. That is part of why the page emphasizes trust and fit before install.

        When managed operations, lower infra burden, higher connected-site counts, or enterprise controls matter more than ownership of the stack.

        Those are strong enterprise signals. The assessment will route you toward Enterprise instead of pretending Starter, Growth, or Standard are enough.

        Use readiness to buy the right lane once.

        The point is not to produce a flattering score. It is to send you toward the product lane, docs path, and setup sequence that matches reality.